Sometimes I would think that work is actually a friend who is always with us, just not talking. If you work hard, it will always be with you, and if you are lazy, it will also be negative and slack.
In fact, although work does not speak, but it feels that it is very want to speak, want to express.
When working, every time I will hear SEHEFASHION company around colleagues mentioned, handing over another colleague's work, such as not taking the initiative to pursue, the results will be sunk in stone, there is no news, always very distressed.
Why does this happen? Is it because you don't know how to speak at work? Yes, the work itself does not speak, but it is very much expected to "voice", if so why does not the person doing the work take the initiative to "voice" on its behalf?
Yes, in the end, why did not the executive to "voice" it? The reasons for this are, I think, the following.
Brain forgetfulness.
The executive may do a variety of tasks every day, and when they are done, they do not record and remind themselves effectively, so they forget to give feedback to the publisher.
No sense of "voice".
This is also the case, the executive's brain simply does not have the sense of feedback "voice", thinking that I have done it is done, no feedback is done anyway. Why should I bother to give feedback?
No habit.
The executive has a sense of "voice", but has not developed a habit of thinking and working mode, think about it, "voice", not think about it, and then forget about it.
Of course, these are the key points that come to mind for the time being, and other reasons cannot be ruled out. Then we think about the consequences of the executive not to "voice" will be what?
Causing confusion to the other side.
If the executor does not "voice" when it is done or not reached on schedule, the publisher will not know the progress of his work, and will not know how to arrange the next step. Is it done, why is it not done, what problems are encountered? We often say that 80% of the problems in the work are communication problems, the executive does not "voice" the state is the obvious communication problems.
Attitude problem.
For the release of personnel, if the other party has not been entrusted with matters to follow up and not "voice", in addition to not knowing the progress of work, will also produce a bad evaluation of the executive, although sometimes the executive is very capable, ahead of schedule or excellent completion of work, but because there is no "voice Although sometimes the executive is very capable and completes the work ahead of schedule or well, but because of the lack of "voice", the evaluation of his work will be greatly reduced, such as a slightly poor attitude, professionalism is inferior.
Problems with review of work results.
In addition to this, it may cause more serious problems. For example, an executive received a job to complete the PPT for tomorrow's launch by tonight, the executive completed but did not "voice" out, did not give timely feedback to the publisher of the completed PPT, there are serious problems in the PPT, to be released when it was found too late, in the market has caused serious negative impact, and to the The company brings incalculable invisible and explicit losses.
That is, we have understood the negative consequences of not "speaking up", so how do we as executors properly "speak up"?
After accepting the work, immediately create a proven work plan, covering the time schedule, and set up a reminder mechanism (you can create a list of documents, desktop sticky notes and other gadgets) to prevent yourself from forgetting to follow up and "voice".
Whether the implementation is in progress or finished, you should make regular "voice", so that the publisher can see the progress you have made at a glance, clear inside, and will consider whether to give the corresponding collaboration or task adjustment.
If the implementation is not completed on schedule due to various problems, you must also "voice" to let the publisher know the reason, and determine whether the next direction needs to be adjusted or continued, and re-plan the work again.
After the execution is completed, promptly "review", if necessary, to the publisher to explain in detail about the completion of the task status, so that the publisher can more clearly understand the specific details of the work, and to optimize and correct the details.
As the saying goes, "everything is implemented, everything has a response", so "voice", not only to enhance the implementation of the effectiveness, but also to enhance their professionalism, to become a trusted partner. If a person loses the word trust, he or she will basically lose any so-called opportunities or even life opportunities. Trust is the basic of life, if you want to gain trust, then start from timely "voice" in the work. Don't let us lose our work - the most important friend in life!
